Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Bjorklund v. Bjorklund Trucking, Inc., 753 N.W.2d 312 (2008)

Citation
Bjorklund v. Bjorklund Trucking, Inc., 753 N.W.2d 312 (2008)
Parent Document
Bjorklund v. Bjorklund Trucking, Inc., 753 N.W.2d 312 (2008)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2008-07-22

Other Sections in This Document (54)

Full Text

460 chars
BTI acknowledges that the district court’s decision whether to stay an eviction proceeding is discretionary and that the “first-filed rule” is not a formal procedural rule but rather a principle based on courtesy and expediency. Nonetheless, BTI contends that denial of its motions to stay was an abuse of discretion under the supreme court’s ruling in Rice Park Props, v. Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, 532 N.W.2d 556 (Minn.1995). BTI asserts that Rice Park