Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Bjorklund v. Bjorklund Trucking, Inc., 753 N.W.2d 312 (2008)

Citation
Bjorklund v. Bjorklund Trucking, Inc., 753 N.W.2d 312 (2008)
Parent Document
Bjorklund v. Bjorklund Trucking, Inc., 753 N.W.2d 312 (2008)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2008-07-22

Other Sections in This Document (54)

Full Text

660 chars
unjust enrichment, and ownership and possession of the Scott County property. BTI’s proposed jury instructions included instructions on breach of contract, contract implied in fact, promissory estoppel, unjust enrichment/constructive trust, specific performance, equitable estoppel, full and part performance, and waiver. The district court denied all of BTI’s requested jury instructions and special-verdict questions, and instructed the jury only on eviction for non-payment of rent or termination of lease, definition of landlord, definition of lease, and definition of a contract. A single-question special-verdict form was submitted to the jury, asking: ■