Section 559
- Citation
- Section 559
- Parent Document
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2002-03-19
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1350498/fraser-v-fraser/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (64)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
Full Text
571 charsUnfortunately, we cannot determine on the record before us whether the eviction action was wife’s only opportunity to address her claims and defenses. We note that wife sued husband and father in a separate action on February 9, 2000, but we lack information about that action. For this reason we remand the eviction action for the district court to (1) address wife’s service claims; (2) address the propriety of entertaining wife’s equitable defenses in the eviction action or in an alternate proceeding; and, if appropriate, (3) decide the equitable defenses. DECISION