Section 559
- Citation
- Section 559
- Parent Document
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2002-03-19
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1350498/fraser-v-fraser/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (64)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
Full Text
620 charsIn the separate eviction action, wife’s answer raised several defenses, including objections to service of the notice of cancellation and the defense of equitable mortgage. The district court determined that wife’s service defenses were not properly before the eviction court because they had been decided adversely to wife in the dissolution action. But, because the district court lacked jurisdiction in the dissolution action to address father’s attempted cancellation of the contract for deed, the rulings in the dissolution action were not binding in the subsequent eviction proceeding. See, e.g., Hauser v. Mealey,