Section 559
- Citation
- Section 559
- Parent Document
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2002-03-19
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1350498/fraser-v-fraser/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (64)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Fraser v. Fraser, 642 N.W.2d 34 (2002)
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
- Section 559
Full Text
739 charsMoreover, compliance with Minn. Stat. § 559.211 has a second prong: that the requirements of Minn. R. Civ. P. 65 be satisfied. Rule 65 requires a threat of immediate, irreparable injury. Minn. R. Civ. P. 65. Here, however, there could be no immediate or irreparable injury from denying an injunction in the dissolution action because wife had the opportunity to start a separate action under Minn.Stat. § 559.221 to enjoin father’s attempt to cancel the contract for deed. Further, if husband’s failure to make the contract-for-deed payments was to blame for father’s attempt to cancel the contract for deed, the district court was required, in the dissolution action, to compensate wife for any loss associated with husband’s conduct. See