DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Behrendt v. Rassmussen, 234 Minn. 97 (1951)

Citation
Behrendt v. Rassmussen, 234 Minn. 97 (1951)
Parent Document
Behrendt v. Rassmussen, 234 Minn. 97 (1951)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1951-04-27
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2038236/behrendt-v-rassmussen/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (55)

Full Text

493 chars 
In Tranchina v. Arcinas, 78 Cal. App. (2d) 522, 178 P. (2d) 65, on facts almost identical with those in the instant case, the court upheld a recovery for abuse of process, not on the ground that there was any wrong in securing judgment in an unlawful detainer action, but because the writ of restitution was perverted to a purpose not contemplated by the court which issued the writ. The writ in that case was actually served. In the words of the court (78 Cal. App. [2d] 524, 178 P. [2d] 67):