Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Behrendt v. Rassmussen, 234 Minn. 97 (1951)

Citation
Behrendt v. Rassmussen, 234 Minn. 97 (1951)
Parent Document
Behrendt v. Rassmussen, 234 Minn. 97 (1951)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1951-04-27

Other Sections in This Document (55)

Full Text

1,136 chars
If a cause of action actually exists, then usually the theory upon which the case was tried becomes the law of the case and must be adhered to in this court. Skolnick v. Gruesner, 196 Minn. 318, 265 N. W. 44; Allen v. Central Motors, Inc. 204 Minn. 295, 283 N. W. 490; Edelstein v. D. M. & I. R. Ry. Co. 225 Minn. 508, 31 N. W. (2d) 465; M. & St. L. R. Co. v. Winters, 242 U. S. 353, 37 S. Ct. 170, 61 L. ed. 358, Ann. Cas. 1918B, 54. But this rule does not apply in a case where the record shows conclusively as a matter of law that on the merits there is no cause of action or no defense. In such case, the appellate court will so determine no matter on what theory the pleadings were framed or the issues were tried in the court below. White v. Western Assur. Co. 52 Minn. 352, 54 N. W. 195; C. M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Sprague, 140 Minn. 1, 167 N. W. 124; Bauman v. Metzger, 145 Minn. 133, 176 N. W. 497; State ex rel. Evens v. City of Duluth, 195 Minn. 563, 262 N. W. 681, 263 N. W. 912, 266 N. W. 736; Skolnick v. Gruesner, 196 Minn. 318, 265 N. W. 44; Casper v. Regional Agricultural Credit Corp. 202 Minn. 433, 278 N. W. 896; *101