DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Behrendt v. Rassmussen, 234 Minn. 97 (1951)

Citation
Behrendt v. Rassmussen, 234 Minn. 97 (1951)
Parent Document
Behrendt v. Rassmussen, 234 Minn. 97 (1951)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1951-04-27
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2038236/behrendt-v-rassmussen/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (55)

Full Text

597 chars 
Housing and Rent Act of 1948. No lease or contract was broken. There was no tortious interference with possession. A proper notice was given, and plaintiffs moved out after a writ of restitution had been issued and before it was served. It is plaintiffs’ contention that in spite of those facts the eviction was unlawful because defendant did not in good faith recover the premises for his own personal use and occupancy in compliance with § 1899 of the 1948 act. In other words, their claim is that the federal act created a cause of action under the complaint and the facts as we have them here.