Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)

Citation
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parent Document
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1976-03-19

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Full Text

548 chars
See, in contrast, Dickhut v. Norton, 45 Wis. 2d 389, 173 N. W. 2d 297 (1970), requiring a tenant to prove by clear and convincing evidence that a code violation existed, that the landlord knew of the tenant’s report of the violation, and that the landlord sought to terminate the lease for the sole purpose of retaliation. See, also, Toms Point Apartments v. Goudzward, 72 Misc. 2d 629, 632, 339 N. Y. S. 2d 281, 286 (1972), imposing a burden on the tenant to prove five elements, including that the overriding reason for eviction is retaliation. 5