Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)

Citation
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parent Document
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1976-03-19

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Full Text

579 chars
Landlord had complained several times to Shawn Fitzgerald, one of the tenants, about the dog. However, there was apparently no discussion about dogs when the lease was entered into and landlord had made no objection when tenants later informed him that they had acquired a dog. There was no evidence on the record of any damage done to the house by the dog or tenants. There was evidence that landlord discussed with tenants their leaving in July in the context of their demands for repairs, informing them that if they were in a hurry to have the repairs done, they could leave.