Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)

Citation: Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parent Document: Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Jurisdiction: Minnesota (state)
Effective Date: 1976-03-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2215510/parkin-v-fitzgerald/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)
Parkin v. Fitzgerald, 240 N.W.2d 828 (1976)

Full Text

327 chars

Few reported cases have faced the problem of articulating a standard to define the quantum of evidence necessary to rebut the presumption of retaliatory purpose. In the landmark case of Robinson v. Diamond Housing Corp. 150 App. D. C. 17, 29, 463 F. 2d 853, 865 (1972), the court suggested a “legitimate business purpose” test: