Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Tachtronic Instruments, Inc., 394 N.W.2d 161 (1986)

Citation
Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Tachtronic Instruments, Inc., 394 N.W.2d 161 (1986)
Parent Document
Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Tachtronic Instruments, Inc., 394 N.W.2d 161 (1986)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1986-10-07

Other Sections in This Document (57)

Full Text

641 chars
Provident commenced a third unlawful detainer action in February 1984. By this time, Tachtronic had already moved most of its operation out of the premises. Mark Troxell (the property manager at Welsh) filed an affidavit stating that he believed Tachtronic was not in the state and could not be found. Welsh served notice by posting the summons and complaint on the door of the leased premises, even though Troxel knew that Tachtronic could be reached at its home offices in New Ulm, Minnesota. Tachtronic thus had no notice of the unlawful detainer hearing and on February 23, 1984 a default judgment for restitution was entered against it.