Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Obermoller, 429 N.W.2d 251 (1988)

Citation
Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Obermoller, 429 N.W.2d 251 (1988)
Parent Document
Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Obermoller, 429 N.W.2d 251 (1988)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1988-09-06

Other Sections in This Document (89)

Full Text

672 chars
The Obermollers assert the forbearance policies as an equitable defense and contend they entered into a rental agreement with the Bank which allows them to remain on the farm. The district court concluded the Obermollers could not assert an equitable claim in the unlawful detainer action and expressly found the Obermollers and the Bank did not have an agreement because the record did not contain any evidence proving a rental agreement existed. Even if the Obermollers’ claim about the existence of a rental agreement presents triable issues, that claim cannot be asserted in this unlawful detainer action. See Thomey, 391 N.W.2d at 536; cf. Lanzo v. F & D Motor Works,