Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Obermoller, 429 N.W.2d 251 (1988)

Citation
Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Obermoller, 429 N.W.2d 251 (1988)
Parent Document
Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Obermoller, 429 N.W.2d 251 (1988)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
1988-09-06

Other Sections in This Document (89)

Full Text

655 chars
The Obermollers’ attorney objected to the submission and acceptance of the parties’ affidavits, in part because the expedited trial procedures under the unlawful de-tainer statute conflicted with the notice and filing requirements of the rules of civil procedure governing summary judgment proceedings. The Obermollers’ attorney also objected later suggesting the summary judgment motion “wasn’t proper,” “wasn’t served right,” and was brought “in violation of the Rules of Civil Procedure.” Although the court suggested both parties could agree to continue the trial which was scheduled to begin the next day, neither party would consent to an extension.