Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Citation
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Parent Document
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Jurisdiction
- Minnesota (state)
- Effective Date
- 2004-09-14
Other Sections in This Document (37)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
- Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
Full Text
788 charsHere, the default judgment is proof that relator violated the terms of the lease. As stated above, the complaint alleged that relator caused $1,259 worth of damage to the apartment unit and that she was using drugs regularly in the apartment. These are “serious” violations of a lease. Under 24 C.F.R. 982.310(d)(1)(h), $1,259 is a substantial amount of money, and the destruction of property can be considered “good cause” to terminate a tenancy. Also, the use of drugs in an apartment is not only a violation of Minn.Stat. 504B.171, subd. l(l)(i) (2002), but it can also provide a basis for the termination of a tenancy under 24 C.F.R. 982.310(c)(1). We conclude that respondent complied with 24 C.F.R. 982.552(b)(2) and properly terminated relator’s Section 8 housing voucher. *338 II.