Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)

Citation
Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
Parent Document
Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2004-09-14

Other Sections in This Document (37)

Full Text

637 chars
In this certiorari appeal, relator tenant argues that respondent improperly terminated her Section 8 housing assistance because (1) respondent lacked authority to terminate Section 8 benefits when the underlying eviction judgment was by default, there was no violation of the lease, and any violation of the lease was not ruled to be the “serious” violation required to terminate Section 8 benefits; (2) the hearing officer failed to recognize that the eviction judgment was by default, make credibility determinations, and make adequate findings; and (3) the hearing officer failed to consider mitigating circumstánces. We affirm. FACTS