Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)

Citation
Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
Parent Document
Cole v. Metropolitan Council HRA, 686 N.W.2d 334 (2004)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2004-09-14

Other Sections in This Document (37)

Full Text

924 chars
24 C.F.R. 982.552(b)(2) provides that “[the Public Housing Authority] must terminate program assistance for a family evicted from housing assisted under the program for serious violation of the lease.” Although section 982.552 does not define what conduct constitutes a serious violation, 24 C.F.R. § 982.310 (2003) provides some insight as to what constitutes a serious violation. 24 C.F.R. § 982.310(a)(1), (3) permits an owner to terminate tenancy when the tenant commits a serious violation or repeated violation of the terms and conditions of the lease, or for other good cause. The regulation goes on to define “good cause” as a family history of destruction of property or of living or housekeeping habits resulting in damage to the unit or premises. 24 C.F.R. § 982.310(d)(1)(h). The regulation further provides that drug use on the property may provide a basis for termination of tenancy. 24 C.F.R. § 982.310(c)(1).