Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
Full Text
412 charsP.3d at 594. Thus, any determination of the prevailing party is premature. Accordingly, we deny the Allens’ request for attorney fees at this time. CONCLUSION We hold that the settlement agreement between Princeton and the Allens was void and unenforceable. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the superior court for proceedings consistent with this opinion. PRICE, J. We concur: MAXA, P.J. CHE, J. 14