Skip to main content

Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf

Citation
Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 58183-3-II Published Opinion.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source verification
official_capture_completeness_unverified

Full Text

1,796 chars
If a writ is granted for Defendants’ failure to strictly comply with any term of this
Agreement, Plaintiff is entitled to an immediate writ of restitution, along with
damages and Plaintiff’s costs and attorney fees.

CP at 55 (emphasis added).

The settlement agreement did not list any specific sections of RLTA as being waived, but

it expressly provided that the “usual unlawful detainer procedures” did not apply. CP at 54. The

agreement provided:

By signing this Agreement, the parties forego the usual unlawful detainer
procedures.

CP at 54 (emphasis added).

III. SHOW CAUSE HEARING ON ALLEGED BREACH OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Within days of signing the agreement, the Allens failed to meet the agreement’s provision

on paying back rent—they were a day late. Princeton rejected the late payment and set the matter

for a show cause hearing. At the hearing, Princeton requested a writ of restitution based on the

late payment.

The superior court found that Princeton was entitled to an immediate writ. However, the

execution of the writ was stayed for over three weeks to afford the Allens additional time to find

4
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.

No. 58183-3-II

other housing. The superior court apparently entered an order on show cause, a writ of restitution,

and a judgment of unlawful detainer.2

IV. MOTION TO VACATE, SUBSEQUENT HEARINGS, AND APPEAL

Two days before the scheduled execution of the writ of restitution in March 2023, the

Allens filed a motion to vacate the judgment of unlawful detainer. In their motion to vacate, the

Allens argued, among other things, that the superior court erred by terminating the tenancy due to

breach of the agreement, that procedural safeguards were not followed, that the breach was