Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Citation
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Parent Document
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-01-05
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4490187/riley-v-dempsey/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (45)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
Full Text
843 charsA party claiming bias or prejudice by the court bears the burden of presenting clear evidence in support of such claims. Cliche v. Fair, 145 Vt. 258, 261-62 (1984). “[I]t is not enough merely to show previous adverse rulings, no matter how erroneous, or numerous (omitting citations); or merely to show a judge’s expression of opinion, uttered in what he conceived to be the discharge of his judicial duty, based upon evidence produced before him.” Id. at 262 (quoting Pettengill v. New Hampshire Insurance Co., 129 Vt. 23, 33 (1970) (further citation omitted)). In the instant case, Mr. Riley has not presented any clear indication of prejudice; instead his claim relies on unsubstantiated suspicion. See State v. Carter, 154 Vt. 646, 647 (1990) (mem.). He has not presented any basis for disturbing the Small Claims Judgment on appeal. ORDER