Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Citation
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Parent Document
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-01-05
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4490187/riley-v-dempsey/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (45)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
- Riley v. Dempsey (2005)
Full Text
476 charsMr. Riley complains that the Small Claims Court failed to quote the statutory definition of “normal wear and tear,” and that the court erred in referring to a “common understanding” of what is meant by the term. The Small Claims Court correctly concluded that a landlord may not recover from a tenant for “normal wear and tear,” under 9 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(2). However, Mr. Riley contends that the court disregarded existing law by crafting its own definition of “wear and tear.”