Alden v. Richardson (2017)

Citation: Alden v. Richardson (2017)
Parent Document: Alden v. Richardson (2017)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2017-04-14
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10026635/alden-v-richardson/ ↗

Full Text

567 chars

Ms. Alden objects that there was no lease in effect when she vacated the property. This
evidently is in response to the small claims court’s statement that she breached a number of the
lease provisions and would be made responsible for attorney fees. The written lease agreement
has a provision saying that it automatically renews until it is terminated. In any event, fees were
available pursuant to 9 V.S.A. § 4456(e) and the court expressly said that they were awarded
because Ms. Alden did not take care of the property. On this record, that was sufficient. ORDER

Other Sections in This Document (31)

Full Text