Alden v. Richardson (2017)

Citation: Alden v. Richardson (2017)
Parent Document: Alden v. Richardson (2017)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2017-04-14
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10026635/alden-v-richardson/ ↗

Full Text

560 chars

Ms. Alden objects that timely written notice to vacate was given to Mr. Richardson and
new tenants took possession at the end of August, not the end of September. The court clearly
found in Mr. Richardson’s favor on both issues. On appeal, the court cannot substitute its view
of the evidence. The small claims court was the finder of fact and there was evidence in the
record to support these findings. Ms. Alden did not present any evidence at the hearing as to
when the new tenancy began. The court cannot consider new evidence on appeal. 3.      Legal fees

Other Sections in This Document (31)

Full Text