Alden v. Richardson (2017)

Citation: Alden v. Richardson (2017)
Parent Document: Alden v. Richardson (2017)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2017-04-14
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10026635/alden-v-richardson/ ↗

Full Text

572 chars

Ms. Alden argues that there was no evidence presented that the holes in the wall were
fixed or that she should be responsible for them. However, Mr. Richardson’s contractor testified
that he saw the large holes in the wall and the claim was for their repair. If Ms. Alden disputed
that they were ever repaired, or what the reasonable value of the repair should have been, she
needed to have presented that evidence at the hearing. She did not. She did disclaim
responsibility for the holes, but the small claims court clearly found to the contrary. 9.      Carpet cleaning

Other Sections in This Document (31)

Full Text