Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Section 2

Citation
Section 2
Parent Document
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2015-08-11

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Full Text

659 chars
Plaintiff argues that Defendants’ failure to provide paystubs amounts to a failure
to provide information under Paragraph 4(f) of the Lease: “the amount of assistance . . .
may be changed during the term of this Agreement if . . . (f) the Tenant fails to provide
information on his/her income, family composition or other factors as required by the
Landlord.” (Emphasis added.) Plaintiff’s argument is that it is authorized to require
paystubs, that it required paystubs and Defendants agreed to that by signing the Intake
Form, and that since they never provided the paystubs, Plaintiff was justified in
retroactive imposition of market rent with no subsidy.