Section 2
- Citation
- Section 2
- Parent Document
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2015-08-11
Other Sections in This Document (94)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
- Section 2
Full Text
401 chars6
On June 8th, Plaintiff’s manager telephoned ARIS and verified that Joshua worked up to
40 hours per week. The next day, June 9th, 2014, ARIS completed a verification form showing
that Joshua was working full time and had an anticipated gross annual pay of $32,136. It is
reasonable to infer that if Plaintiff had made the call to ARIS sooner, it would have received this
information sooner.