Section 2

Citation: Section 2
Parent Document: Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2015-08-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4489499/highgate-housing-limited-partne... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Highgate Housing Limited Partnership v. Macaulay-Fisher (2015)
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2
Section 2

Full Text

537 chars

On August 8th, Plaintiff’s manager telephoned ARIS and verified that Joshua continued to
work full time. It had not yet given tenants any notice of recalculation of the amount of rent due
or loss of subsidy. It continued its position that tenants had not met their responsibilities to
provide necessary information because the paystubs had not been submitted. The Interim
Recertification was uncompleted, and the Annual Recertification was also pending. The
Defendants received no notices of rent due. On August 21, 2014, they paid $200.