Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)

Citation
Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
Parent Document
Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2011-02-04

Other Sections in This Document (48)

Full Text

361 chars
10
Plaintiff could claim to have relied. Under these circumstances, Plaintiff’s claims in reliance on
“foreseeability” and “public policy” must be rejected as yet another attempt to elude the purposes
of the economic loss doctrine. Defendants Bruno and DEW motion for summary judgment on
the implied warranty claim is GRANTED. b. Third-Party Beneficiary Status