Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Citation
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Parent Document
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Jurisdiction
- Vermont (state)
- Effective Date
- 2011-02-04
Other Sections in This Document (48)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
- Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
Full Text
1,629 charsThe Court is not convinced that this exception is available here. The undisputed facts demonstrate that there was no accident, injury, or collapse of any structure on the property. The Association’s president alleges that due to flaws in the design and construction of elements comprising the Treetop development, large amounts of water runs off and accumulates on roadways, causing serviceability problems, including buildup of ice, which in turn creates dangerous conditions for passage by users either in cars or on foot. Stoltz Aff. ¶ 17. Notwithstanding these allegations, the damages claimed by the Association are still largely for the costs to repair the construction defects and all of the consequential losses that arose from those defects, absent any claim for personal injury or significant collateral property damage. Indeed, the Vermont Supreme Court, has held that “warranty law would, in effect, be subsumed into tort law” if the court were to allow recovery for purely economic losses absent any physical harm based solely on claims that an alleged defect could have endangered persons or their property. Paquette, 168 Vt. at 264 (denying the availability of purely economic damages under theories of strict liability in the defective motor home context) (emphasis added). Accordingly, without deciding whether the unreasonably dangerous condition exception to the economic loss rule is in fact recognized by Vermont’s law, the Court concludes that Plaintiff is unable to put forth facts establishing the prerequisites to such an exception. II. Contract Claims a. Breach of Implied Warranty of Habitability Claim