Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)

Citation
Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
Parent Document
Treetop at Stratton Condo. Ass'n v. Treetop Dev. Co. (2011)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2011-02-04

Other Sections in This Document (48)

Full Text

834 chars
The Association alleges that Defendants Bruno and DEW provided the Association with
an implied warranty of habitability. The Association claims that Bruno provided an implied
warranty by virtue of the fact that Bruno provided the Developer with plans. Bruno urges this
Court to grant summary judgment in favor of Bruno on this claim because: (1) the issuance of
plans by an engineer or architect does not, as a matter of law, create an express or implied
warranty; (2) Bruno’s contract with Stratton Mountain Resort specifically states that Bruno did
not provide any warranties for its work on the project; (3) the Association and Bruno did not
share a contractual relationship; and (4) the Association cannot produce any factual support for
the contention that Bruno provided the Association with an implied warranty of habitability.