Collision Communications, Inc. v. P Nokia Solutions and Networks OY, 2025 DNH 011 (2025)

Citation: Collision Communications, Inc. v. P Nokia Solutions and Networks OY, 2025 DNH 011 (2025)
Parent Document: Collision Communications, Inc. v. P Nokia Solutions and Networks OY, 2025 DNH 011 (2025)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 2025-01-31
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10697928/collision-communications-inc-v... ↗

Full Text

714 chars

removes an oral contract that cannot be performed within a year from the statute of
frauds. Other cases from around the same period, however, indicated that full
performance of one party’s obligations may remove an oral contract from the statute
of frauds. See Blanding, 33 N.H. at 246. The New Hampshire Supreme Court cleared
up this ambiguity as to full performance in McIntire v. Woodall, 140 N.H. 228, 231
(1995), where the court held that an oral contract which contains obligations that
cannot be performed within one year may nevertheless be enforceable if one party
can perform—and does perform—all their contractual obligations within a year. The
doctrine of full performance is not at issue in this case.

Other Sections in This Document (961)

Full Text