Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
Full Text
1,711 charssuperior court erred in finding that it defaulted, based on Dellen' s failing to file annual or
quarterly reports, because, Dellen asserts, no applicable statute or regulation defines " default" as
a failure to file reports. Br. of Appellant at 25. This argument also fails.
Dellen concedes that it did not file quarterly and annual reports with the Department;
again, Dellen asserts that the Department told it not to do so. The record does not support this
assertion. Instead, the record shows that the Department did not notify Dellen to continue filing
reports because Dellen had sent the Department a letter electing to default and asking the
Department to take over administration of Dellen' s workers' compensation benefit payments;
accordingly, the Department understood Dellen to be in default status, for which continued
29
reporting was not required .
29 In contrast, had Dellen not elected to default, and had elected instead to terminate its self -
insured status, the Department would have sent a notice of late reporting.
IR
No. 43636 -1 - II
Furthermore, WAC 296- 15- 121( 8)( b) provides that the Department may release an
employer terminating its self insured
- status from its reporting requirement when no activity
occurs for a full year on any of the employer' s injured worker claims. Dellen' s last injured
employee claim activity occurred in 2004; thus, if Dellen had terminated its self insured
- status
instead of defaulting), it would have been required to file quarterly reports until 2005.
Accordingly, Dellen' s failure to file such reports ( 1) would have constituted a failure to comply