Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — D2 43636-1-II Published Opinion.pdf
Full Text
1,792 chars631, 273 P. 3d t035 ( 2012) ( quoting Amunrud v. Bd. ofAppeals, 158 Wn.2d 208, 216, 143 P. 3d
571 ( 2006)). Due process does not require actual notice; rather, it requires the government to
provide "` notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties
of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections. "'
Speelman, 167 Wn. App. at 631 ( internal quotation marks omitted) ( quoting Jones v. Flowers,
547 U.S. 220, 226, 126 S. Ct. 1708, 164 L. Ed. 2d 415 ( 2006)).
A claimant alleging deprivation of due process must first establish a legitimate claim of
entitlement. Haberman v. Wash. Pub. Power Supply Sys., 109 Wn.2d 107, 142, 744 P. 2d 1032,
750 P. 2d 254 ( 1988). Legitimate claims of entitlement entail vested liberty or property rights.
Haberman, 109 Wn.2d at 142 ( citing In re Marriage of MacDonald, 104 Wn.2d 745, 748, 709
22
No. 43636 -1 - II
P. 2d 1196 ( 1985)). A vested right must be something more than a mere expectation based upon
an anticipated continuance of the existing law; it must have become a title, legal or equitable, to
the present or future enjoyment of property, a demand, or a legal exemption from a demand by
another. Caritas Servs., Inc. v. Dep' t of Soc. & Health Servs., 123 Wn.2d 391, 414, 869 P. 2d 28
1994).
Here, Dellen did not have a legitimate claim of entitlement to the surety, which it had
provided when it defaulted and asked the Department to take over administration of Dellen' s
injured workers' claims. Our state legislature expressly provided that a self -insured employer
defaulting on its Act obligations loses all right and title to, any interest in, and any right to