Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. Carleton, 133 N.H. 809 (1991)

Citation: Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. Carleton, 133 N.H. 809 (1991)
Parent Document: Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. Carleton, 133 N.H. 809 (1991)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 1991-01-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8090733/woodstock-soapstone-co-v-carleton/ ↗

Full Text

566 chars

In the present case, Carleton raised the issue of Dukes’s authority to assign the option on behalf of Life Sciences. This he cannot do. Not only is this not a defense that Carleton could have raised against the assignor, Life Sciences, but it is a defense that would merely render the assignment voidable at Life Sciences’s election. Our review of the record indicates that Carleton has failed to raise any valid defense against the assignment. Accordingly, the trial court’s ruling that the assignment was invalid is reversed. IV. Life Sciences as a Necessary Party

Other Sections in This Document (33)

Full Text