Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. Carleton, 133 N.H. 809 (1991)

Citation: Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. Carleton, 133 N.H. 809 (1991)
Parent Document: Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. Carleton, 133 N.H. 809 (1991)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 1991-01-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8090733/woodstock-soapstone-co-v-carleton/ ↗

Full Text

741 chars

The issues we decide on appeal are (1) whether the superior court properly interpreted the escalation clause in the lease, (2) whether the court had preemptive equity jurisdiction permitting it to enjoin the landlord from taking any action to prejudice the tenant’s rights in the property, (3) whether the court properly allowed the landlord to question the validity of the assignment of the purchase option and found that Life Sciences’s assignment was made without authority, (4) whether the court properly found that Life Sciences was not a necessary party, and (5) whether the court properly denied Woodstock an award of attorney’s fees. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. I. Tax Escalation Clause

Other Sections in This Document (33)

Full Text