DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. Carleton, 133 N.H. 809 (1991)

Citation
Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. Carleton, 133 N.H. 809 (1991)
Parent Document
Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. Carleton, 133 N.H. 809 (1991)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
1991-01-28
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8090733/woodstock-soapstone-co-v-carleton/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (33)

Full Text

397 chars 
Woodstock cross appeals, claiming that the superior court erred in ruling that Life Sciences’s assignment of the purchase option was made without actual or apparent authority. Woodstock asserts that Carleton did not have standing to contest Dukes’s authority as a de*815fense to enforcement of the option. Finally, Woodstock appeals from the superior court’s decision not to award attorney’s fees.