Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hynes v. Hale, 146 N.H. 533 (2001)

Citation
Hynes v. Hale, 146 N.H. 533 (2001)
Parent Document
Hynes v. Hale, 146 N.H. 533 (2001)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
2001-06-22

Full Text

465 chars
Hynes next argues that any implied grant of permission could not override the express prohibition against fences over four feet in height contained in the park’s rules, which were incorporated in Hale’s lease. This argument is without merit. Hale did not seek to enforce an implied covenant in her lease. Rather, she sought a declaration that applying the express prohibition against fences over four feet in height violated RSA 205-A:2, VIII(d). IV Scope of Relief