Hynes v. Hale, 146 N.H. 533 (2001)

Citation: Hynes v. Hale, 146 N.H. 533 (2001)
Parent Document: Hynes v. Hale, 146 N.H. 533 (2001)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 2001-06-22
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8092344/hynes-v-hale/ ↗

Full Text

708 chars

We are not persuaded by Hynes’ argument that because Hale signed an agreement to abide by the park’s rules, her claim sounds in breach of contract. In her board complaint, Hale did not seek common law redress for breach of contract, but rather the statutory redress afforded by RSA chapter 205-A. See id. at 727. She did not seek a determination that Hynes breached her lease, but rather a determination as to the validity of his enforcement of park rule 6(k). Nor did she seek damages for any alleged breach of her lease, but rather a declaration that enforcing park rule 6(k) to require her to replace six-foot fencing with four-foot fencing violated RSA 205-A-.2, VIII(d). See id. II. Board’s Jurisdiction

Other Sections in This Document (29)

Full Text