Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hynes v. Hale, 146 N.H. 533 (2001)

Citation
Hynes v. Hale, 146 N.H. 533 (2001)
Parent Document
Hynes v. Hale, 146 N.H. 533 (2001)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
2001-06-22

Full Text

511 chars
Hynes asserts that even if factually correct, the trial court’s finding (and derivatively the board’s finding) is erroneous as a matter of law. He first argues that RSA 205-A:2, VIII(d), restricting a manufactured housing park owner’s ability to require a tenant to remove private property for which the tenant had prior permission, does not apply where the permission is “implicit.” To the contrary, RSA 205-A:2, VIII(d) refers only to “prior permission,” and does not require that such permission be explicit.