Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/857088.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
Full Text
1,774 charsargument fails because, although the record contains evidence that Bittner had been diagnosed with anxiety and depression by January 2020, Bittner has not cited any evidence in the record showing that Symetra’s actions caused him to be diagnosed with anxiety and depression. Nor has Bittner identified any evidence showing that he informed Symetra that he was suffering from anxiety and depression when he took his medical leave in October 2019. Instead, the record shows that Bittner’s disability related to gastrointestinal issues stemming primarily - 25 - For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 85708-8-I from diverticulitis. Bittner solely referenced his gastrointestinal issues when describing his disability in his complaint and summary judgment briefing below. But no evidence indicates that Symetra’s actions caused Bittner’s gastrointestinal issues. Thus, the record does not support Bittner’s contention that he became disabled as a result of Symetra’s actions. Second, Bittner contends Symetra replaced him due to performance issues that Symetra knew were caused by his disability. In support of this contention, Bittner points to an e-mail from December 2018 in which Fry criticized Bittner for missing a meeting that Bittner claims to have missed due to diverticulitis. But the text of the e-mail reveals that Fry’s concerns did not relate to Bittner’s diverticulitis but instead to Bittner’s repeated failure to attend meetings without notice. In the e-mail, Fry assured Bittner, “I am sorry that you were/are under the weather and wish you a speedy recovery. I know that diverticulitis is not something to take lightly.” Additionally, Bittner admitted in his deposition testimony that he missed