Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/857088.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
Full Text
1,732 charswe would conclude that he has shown pretext. To show pretext, Bittner must produce “sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact either (1) that the employer’s articulated reason for its action is pretextual or (2) that although the employer’s stated reason is legitimate, discrimination nevertheless was a substantial factor motivating the employer.” Scrivener, 181 Wn.2d at 441-42. Here, Ward e-mailed Fry about his “concern” that Bittner was offering “bad advice” to “disgruntled” employees such as Doe to seek legal advice. Ward then instructed Fry to tell Bittner that “[i]t’s not your place to tell any Symetra employee to seek legal advice, e.g. D. Rotz.” Fry did so, and he later categorized this issue as an “area . . . where your performance as a sales leader . . . needs to improve.” Costello and Fry effectively told Bittner that he “would be fired” if he continued telling employees to seek legal advice. Immediately after these discussions with Bittner in July 2018, his superiors began raising the critiques of his performance as an RVP that contributed to Bittner being placed on a PIP in February 2019, initially terminated in October 2019, and ultimately replaced in January 2020. Additionally, Bittner complained to his superiors about perceived age discrimination against Jaggers just before he was initially terminated in October 2019. Viewing this evidence in the light most favorable to Bittner, a reasonable juror could conclude that Symetra’s legitimate, nonretaliatory reasons for taking the adverse actions are pretextual or that retaliation was a substantial factor motivating Symetra. - 20 - For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 85708-8-I