Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/857088.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
Full Text
1,738 chars- 17 - For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 85708-8-I 3. Causation To satisfy the third element of his retaliation claims, Bittner must show that retaliation was a “substantial factor” motivating the adverse action. Cornwell, 192 Wn.2d at 412. A substantial factor “must be a significant motivating factor, but need not be the sole factor, or even a determining factor, in the decision.” City of Seattle v. Am. Healthcare Servs., Inc., 13 Wn. App. 2d 838, 858, 468 P.3d 637 (2020). “When the record contains reasonable but competing inferences of both discrimination and nondiscrimination, the trier of fact must determine the true motivation.” Scrivener v. Clark Coll., 181 Wn.2d 439, 445, 334 P.3d 541 (citing Rice v. Offshore Sys., Inc., 167 Wn. App. 77, 90, 272 P.3d 865 (2012)). Here, Bittner produced on summary judgment the following evidence of Symetra’s retaliatory intent. In September 2017, Ward e-mailed Fry asking whether they should offer “coaching” to Bittner because he “has given some bad advice to employees in the past who are feel[ing] disgruntled with Symetra, e.g. you should seek legal advice” and “[m]y concern is that he will do the same with [Doe].” In July 2018, shortly after Symetra concluded its investigation into Doe’s claim, Ward instructed Fry in an e-mail to tell Bittner to stop “[a]dvising employees to seek legal advice. . . . It’s not your place to tell any Symetra employee to seek legal advice, e.g. D. Rotz.” Following that meeting, Fry wrote a letter to Bittner that outlined performance areas that “need[] to improve” and instructed him to stop “[a]dvising employees to seek legal advice” and to “[k]now when to listen and keep