Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Citation
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Parent Document
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2008-04-04
Other Sections in This Document (13)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
Full Text
436 charsHere, the trial court did not err when it ruled that the landlord could proceed with the eviction despite accepting future rent. Unlike Miller, in which the landlord failed to notify the tenants that its acceptance of future rent did not waive its right to evict them, Miller, 150 N.H. at 661, the landlord in this case notified the tenant in its July 12 letter that its acceptance of future rent would not waive its right to evict him.