Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Citation
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Parent Document
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2008-04-04
Other Sections in This Document (13)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
Full Text
510 charsWe will not disturb the findings of the trial court unless they lack evidentiary support or are erroneous as a matter of law. Miller, 150 N.H. at 659. Legal conclusions, as well as the application of law to fact, are reviewed independently for plain error. Id. Accordingly, our inquiry is to determine whether the evidence presented to the trial court reasonably supports its findings, and then whether the court’s decision is consonant with applicable law. Id. Finally, we review questions of law de novo. Id.