Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Citation
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Parent Document
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2008-04-04
Other Sections in This Document (13)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
- Colonial Village, Inc. v. Pelkey, 157 N.H. 91 (2008)
Full Text
320 charsThe tenant argues that a landlord may not accept future rent during a pending possessory action because doing so waives the notice to quit, requiring the landlord to begin eviction proceedings anew. He argues that a landlord’s acceptance of rent creates a new tenancy as a matter of law, relying principally upon Miller.