Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

§ 20

Citation
§ 20
Parent Document
South Willow Properties, LLC v. Burlington Coat Factory of New Hampshire, LLC, 986 A.2d 506 (2009)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
2009-12-16

Other Sections in This Document (62)

Full Text

848 chars
with the HVAC units, how the 84,000 square feet of old roofing material would be disposed of, and whether the material contained asbestos and, if so, how it would be treated in compliance with New Hampshire environmental laws. Kramer also testified that in addition to a general quote, “plans and specifications” would include “detailed conversations with the roofer,” “detailed drawings,” “shop drawings to handle certain specific, unique situations,” a “field walk-through,” and an “inspection.” Furthermore, BCF did not specify which of the several bids it was going to choose. Based upon the evidence at trial, we affirm the reasonableness of the trial court’s finding that the bids forwarded to South Willow on October 13,2005, “were not plans and specifications, as those terms are normally used, to satisfy the requirements of paragraph 15.”