Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/850318.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850318.pdf
Full Text
1,719 charsmatter, the Division II panel concluded that the housing authority had only provided 10 days’ notice to Asentista and that, pursuant to Section 4024 of the CARES Act, he was entitled to 30 days’ notice. In so concluding, the panel relied 12 The Housing Authority urges us to rely on an informal question and answer document drafted by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and discussing certain provisions of the CARES Act. HUD, CDBG EVICTION MORATORIUM Q&AS 2-3 (2020), https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/CPD/documents/CDBG_Eviction_Moratorium_QAs_2020_05_18 _FINAL.pdf [https://perma.cc/AL3V-N6GN] That document was created after the CARES Act was enacted. We do not give this informal document substantial deference. There is no indication that such document was created through a formal process. Furthermore, other than being consistent with the plain meaning analysis above and drafted by an entity with a special expertise in the matter herein, it is not significantly persuasive. 23 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 85031-8-I/24 on our decision in Pinzon and the CRS report, discussed supra. Asentista, slip op. at 6-10. For the reasons previously stated herein, we respectfully disagree with Division II’s reasoning and decision in Asentista. F Section 4024 of the CARES Act requires 30 days’ notice only for evictions stemming from nonpayment of rent. Congress clearly intended that the subsections of Section 4024 be interpreted as one, and when read as such, such is the unambiguous plain meaning that follows. The economic context of the CARES Act’s other provisions and persuasive decisional authority from other