Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)

Citation: Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
Parent Document: Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 2022-04-01
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6456928/melissa-natal-v-gmpm-company-a/ ↗

Full Text

705 chars

In light of our holding that the defendant’s property was not a shared
facility, we conclude the circuit court did not err by holding that the plaintiff
was “a normal tenant” entitled to the protections set forth in RSA chapters 540
and 540-A. There is no dispute that the plaintiff rented a room from the
defendant. See RSA 540-A:1, II. Moreover, the defendant has not developed an
argument that any of the other exceptions to the definition of “tenancy” set
forth in RSA 540:1-a, IV applied here. See RSA 540:1-a, IV(a)-(h). Therefore,
we conclude that the plaintiff was a “tenant” pursuant to RSA chapter 540, and
we affirm the circuit court’s order on that basis. See RSA 540:1-a, IV; RSA
540-A:1, II.

Other Sections in This Document (26)

Full Text