Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)

Citation: Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
Parent Document: Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 2022-04-01
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6456928/melissa-natal-v-gmpm-company-a/ ↗

Full Text

634 chars

The parties dispute the meaning of the language in RSA 540-B:1. The
defendant argues that nothing in the provision’s language requires that the
owner “sleep in or occupy” the premises for it to be considered a shared facility.
Instead, the defendant maintains that access to the common areas for
purposes of cleaning, maintaining, and monitoring the premises fulfills the
requirement that the owner “shares . . . significant portions of the facility in
common” with the occupants. The plaintiff counters that the term “shares,” as
used in RSA 540-B:1, requires that the owner live in and use the facility in
common with the occupants.

Other Sections in This Document (26)

Full Text