Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Citation
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Parent Document
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2022-04-01
Other Sections in This Document (26)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
- Melissa Natal v. GMPM Company & a. (2022)
Full Text
525 charsAccordingly, we conclude that the term “shared facility” as defined by RSA 540-B:1 mandates that the owner of the leased property live in, and share the use and enjoyment of one or more significant portions of, the facility in common with the occupants. Here, the circuit court found that the defendant “does not occupy the premises but that [the defendant’s agent] does visit the property to clean and for maintenance.” Therefore, the record supports a finding that the defendant did not use or enjoy the common areas of the